Cargando...
Fecha
2022-12-01
Editor/a
Director/a
Tutor/a
Coordinador/a
Prologuista
Revisor/a
Ilustrador/a
Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editorial
LA LEY
Citas
0 citas en 
0 citas en 
Resumen
La STJUE declara que el Derecho de la Unión debe interpretarse en el sentido de que se opone a una normativa nacional relativa a un procedimiento sumario de pago de honorarios de abogado en virtud del cual la demanda presentada contra el cliente consumidor es objeto de una resolución dictada por una autoridad no jurisdiccional. De hecho, la intervención de un órgano jurisdiccional sólo se produce en la fase de recurso contra dicha resolución, si Jo hubiere, sin que en tal caso el órgano jurisdiccional pueda entrar a valorar ni el carácter abusivo de las cláusulas contenidas en el contrato que dio Jugar al litigio, ni tampoco sea factible aportar pruebas distintas a las aportadas al órgano no jurisdiccional. Asimismo, se valora desde la perspectiva de cláusulas abusivas o prácticas desleales -engañosas en concreto- el contrato celebrado entre un abogado y su cliente en el que se prohíbe a éste desistir del procedimiento sin conocimiento o contra el consejo de aquél y que estipula una penalidad económica para el caso de incumplimiento de esta prohibición.
ECJ declares that EU Law must be interpreted as prec/uding national /egis/ation re/ating to a summary procedure far the payment of /awyers» fees under which the c/aim brought against the consumer client is the subject of a decision given by a non-jurisdictional authority. In fact, the intervention of a court takes place only at the stage of the appeal against that decision, if any, without the court being able in such a case to assess either the unfairness of the terms contained in the contract which gave rise to the dispute or the possibility of adducing evidence other than that adduced befare the non-jurisdictional court. On the other hand, a contract concluded between a lawyer and his c/ient which prohibits the latter from withdrawing from the proceedings without his knowledge or against his advice and which stipulates a financia/ penalty in the event of non-compliance with that prohibition is assessed from the point of view of unfair terms or unfair practices - in particular, mis/eading terms.
ECJ declares that EU Law must be interpreted as prec/uding national /egis/ation re/ating to a summary procedure far the payment of /awyers» fees under which the c/aim brought against the consumer client is the subject of a decision given by a non-jurisdictional authority. In fact, the intervention of a court takes place only at the stage of the appeal against that decision, if any, without the court being able in such a case to assess either the unfairness of the terms contained in the contract which gave rise to the dispute or the possibility of adducing evidence other than that adduced befare the non-jurisdictional court. On the other hand, a contract concluded between a lawyer and his c/ient which prohibits the latter from withdrawing from the proceedings without his knowledge or against his advice and which stipulates a financia/ penalty in the event of non-compliance with that prohibition is assessed from the point of view of unfair terms or unfair practices - in particular, mis/eading terms.
Descripción
La versión registrada de este artículo, publicado por primera vez en “La Ley Unión Europea, Nº 109, diciembre de 2022", está disponible en línea en el sitio web del editor: La LEY
The registered version of this article, first published in “La Ley Unión Europea, Nº 109, diciembre de 2022", is available online at the publisher's website: La LEY
The registered version of this article, first published in “La Ley Unión Europea, Nº 109, diciembre de 2022", is available online at the publisher's website: La LEY
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
Art. 47 CDFUE, Cláusulas abusivas en los contratos celebrados con consumidores, Procedimiento sumario de pago de honorarios de abogado, Directiva 93/13/CEE, Prácticas comerciales desleales con los consumidores, Directiva 2005/29/CE/CE, Práctica comercial engañosa, Article 47 EUCFR of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Summary procedure for the recovery of lawyers» fees; Unfair terms in consumer contracts, Directive 93/13/CEE, Unfair business to consumer commercial practices, Directive 2005/29/CE; Misleading commercial practice.
Citación
Arroyo Aparicio, A., (2022).“Cláusula sobre honorarios de abogado: procedimiento sumario de reclamación de honorarios y su apreciación como abusiva o engañosa Sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia 9ª de 22 de septiembre de 2022, As. C-335/21: Vicente y Delia”, La Ley Unión Europea, Nº 109, diciembre de 2022, Editorial LA LEY, pgs. 1-14.
Centro
Facultad de Derecho
Departamento
Derecho Mercantil