Cargando...
Fecha
2024-12-31
Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editorial
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (España). Acción Psicológica
Citas
Resumen
Este estudio analiza la estructura y fiabilidad de los factores de la Escala de Respuestas de Asco (ERA) en una muestra de hablantes de español, continuando investigaciones previas que desarrollaron y validaron preliminarmente la escala mediante análisis factoriales exploratorios. El análisis factorial confirmatorio respalda un modelo trifactorial sobre un modelo unifactorial hipotético, mostrando un ajuste superior. Los resultados sugieren que el modelo trifactorial se ajusta adecuadamente a los datos, respaldando la validez de la ERA. Se destacan limitaciones en el método de estimación y los datos. Se halló una buena fiabilidad en el AFC, coherente con análisis previos. Se insta a investigar en poblaciones clínicas, adolescentes e infantiles, considerando la inclusión del tratamiento del asco en psicoterapias
This study examines the structure and reliability of factors in the Disgust Response Scale (DRS) among a sample of Spanish speakers, building on previous research that initially developed and validated the scale through exploratory factor analyses. Confirmatory factor analysis supports a three-factor model over a hypothetical single-factor model, demonstrating superior fit. The results suggest that the three-factor model adequately fits the data, supporting the validity of the DRS. Limitations in the estimation method and data are noted. Good reliability was found in the confirmatory factor analysis, consistent with previous analyses. Further research is encouraged in clinical populations, adolescents, and children, considering the inclusion of disgust treatment in psychotherapies.
This study examines the structure and reliability of factors in the Disgust Response Scale (DRS) among a sample of Spanish speakers, building on previous research that initially developed and validated the scale through exploratory factor analyses. Confirmatory factor analysis supports a three-factor model over a hypothetical single-factor model, demonstrating superior fit. The results suggest that the three-factor model adequately fits the data, supporting the validity of the DRS. Limitations in the estimation method and data are noted. Good reliability was found in the confirmatory factor analysis, consistent with previous analyses. Further research is encouraged in clinical populations, adolescents, and children, considering the inclusion of disgust treatment in psychotherapies.
Descripción
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
análisis factorial confirmatorio, escala de asco, fiabilidad psicométrica, modelo trifactorial, confirmatory factor analysis, disgust scale, psychometric reliability, three-factor model