Publicación:
Gender Differences in Clinical Practice Regarding Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorKnox, Emily Caitlin Lily
dc.contributor.authorMateo Rodríguez, Inmaculada
dc.contributor.authorDaponte-Codina, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorRosell-Ortiz, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorSolá-Muñoz, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorCodina-Rodríguez, Antía
dc.contributor.authorBueno, Héctor
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Azpiazu, José Ignacio
dc.contributor.funderInstituto de Salud Carlos III
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-23T15:01:38Z
dc.date.available2026-02-23T15:01:38Z
dc.date.issued2025-02-26
dc.descriptionThe registered version of this article, first published in Journal of Clinical Medicine, is available online at the publisher's website: MDPI, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051583
dc.descriptionLa versión registrada de este artículo, publicado por primera vez en Journal of Clinical Medicine, está disponible en línea en el sitio web del editor: MDPI, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051583
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objectives: A systematic review was performed with the aim of analysing potential sex differences in the overall treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods: Studies published between January 2011 and November 2023 that conducted a sex-based analysis of the provision of any type of therapeutic measure to treat CHD were included. A search was performed of the Web of Science database in November 2023, resulting in 9070 articles. Study quality was examined using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. A worksheet was produced to extract data pertaining to the title, year of publication, sample, context, study design, dependent variables, time-frame, treatment type, and outcomes reported by each article. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, and the research protocol was submitted to PROSPERO (CRD42022330238). Results: A total of 80 articles presenting data representing 560.070,624 individual datapoints were selected to comprise the final sample. The main findings revealed that the majority of studies highlighted inequalities that disadvantaged females in all analysed treatment categories (pharmacological treatment, invasive interventions, rehabilitation programmes, and other treatment types). Conclusions: Despite the abundance of evidence on the need to improve healthcare provision to females with CHD, few studies examined the reasons or mechanisms underlying the inequalities identified.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2026-02-23T15:01:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Gender Differences in Clinical Practice Regarding Coronary Heart Disease.pdf: 1776310 bytes, checksum: 73930d2ffb8670aff886ec7a3cd5b6fa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2025-02-26en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was partially supported by the National Institutes of Health, grant number PI19/00561, from the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Madrid, Spain.
dc.description.versionversión publicada
dc.identifier.citationKnox, E.C.L.; Mateo-Rodríguez, I.; Daponte-Codina, A.; Rosell-Ortiz, F.; Solá-Muñoz, S.; Codina-Rodríguez, A.; Bueno, H.; Ruiz-Azpiazu, J.I. Gender Differences in Clinical Practice Regarding Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 1583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ jcm14051583
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051583
dc.identifier.eissn2077-0383
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14468/31899
dc.journal.issue5
dc.journal.titleJournal of Clinical Medicine
dc.journal.volume14
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.centerFacultad de Psicología
dc.relation.departmentPsicología Social y de las Organizaciones
dc.relation.projectidinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ISCIII/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020 (ISCIII)/PI19/00561
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.es
dc.subject6106 Psicología experimental
dc.subject.keywordscoronary heart diseaseen
dc.subject.keywordsgenderen
dc.subject.keywordstreatmentsen
dc.subject.keywordsreviewen
dc.subject.keywordscardiovascularen
dc.subject.keywordswomenen
dc.titleGender Differences in Clinical Practice Regarding Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Reviewen
dc.typeartículoes
dc.typejournal articleen
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationcca31c5a-04c2-4831-859d-791dd49a475b
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverycca31c5a-04c2-4831-859d-791dd49a475b
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Gender Differences in Clinical Practice Regarding Coronary Heart Disease.pdf
Tamaño:
1.69 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
3.62 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículos y papers