Cargando...
Fecha
2023-01-08
Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editorial
Topoi
Citas
Resumen
What type of speech act is a norm of action, when the norm is agreed upon as the conclusion of an argumentative dialogue? My hypothesis is that, whenever a norm of action is the conclusion of an argument, it should be analyzed as the statement of a norm and thus as a verdictive speech act. If the context is appropriate, and the interlocutors are sincerely (or institutionally) committed to their argumentative exchange and its conclusion, then this verdictive motivates and institutes a new one with the force of an exercitive. The interlocutors’ recognition and acceptance that the new illocution has been performed lends the norm its exercitive force.
Descripción
The registered version of this article, first published in “Topoi 42, 2023", is available online at the publisher's website: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-022-09876-0
La versión registrada de este artículo, publicado por primera vez en “Topoi 42, 2023", está disponible en línea en el sitio web del editor: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-022-09876-0
La versión registrada de este artículo, publicado por primera vez en “Topoi 42, 2023", está disponible en línea en el sitio web del editor: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-022-09876-0
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
practical argument, illocutionary, perlocutionary, verdictives, exercitives, Austin
Citación
Corredor, C. Agreeing on a Norm: What Sort of Speech Act?. Topoi 42, 495–507 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-022-09876-0
Centro
Facultad de Filosofía
Departamento
Lógica, Historia y Filosofía de la Ciencia