Cargando...
Fecha
2025-03-12
Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editorial
Elsevier
Citas
Resumen
Background: The World Health Organization recently revised the criteria for the diagnosis of depressive disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). This most recent version of the classification (ICD-11) presents some notable differences from the previous one that may impact the prevalence rate.
Objective: This study aims to assess the impact of changes on the diagnosis of depressive episodes in the general population.
Method: We used a general population sample (n = 2911; Age, M = 59; Gender, 56 % women) from the project ‘Edad con Salud’ using face-to-face interviews based on the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Instrument. To explore the impact of changes between ICD-10 and ICD-11, we compared participants with a diagnosis of a depressive disorder and those without, as well as participants who presented depression in only one of the two versions.
Results: When using the ICD-10 criteria, we identified 189 cases of depressive episodes against 186 with ICD-11. Five and two participants were respectively diagnosed only with ICD-10 and ICD-11. The weighted lifetime prevalence is identical using both diagnostic criteria (6.3 %).
Conclusion: Despite the changes introduced in the classification, the prevalence of depressive episodes identified by ICD-10 and ICD-11 in a general population sample is almost identical
Descripción
The registered version of this article, first published in Journal of Psychiatric Research, is available online at the publisher's website:
Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.03.012
La versión registrada de este artículo, publicado por primera vez en Journal of Psychiatric Research, está disponible en línea en el sitio web del editor: Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.03.012
This study was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III-FIS [grant numbers PI19/00088, PI19/00103, PI19/00150, PI19/00235]. Blanca Dolz del Castellar’s work is supported by the program ‘Contratos predoctorales para Formaci´ on de Personal Investigador, FPI-UAM’, Universidad Aut´ onoma de Madrid, Spain. Lea Francia’s work is supported by funds from the European Union’s recovery, transformation, resilience, and Next Generation-EU plan: Exp. INVESTIGO 2022-C23. I01.P03.S0020-0000031- ´ Area Psiquiatría). J. L. Ayuso-Mateos acknowledges the support from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (BA21- 00013).
La versión registrada de este artículo, publicado por primera vez en Journal of Psychiatric Research, está disponible en línea en el sitio web del editor: Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.03.012
This study was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III-FIS [grant numbers PI19/00088, PI19/00103, PI19/00150, PI19/00235]. Blanca Dolz del Castellar’s work is supported by the program ‘Contratos predoctorales para Formaci´ on de Personal Investigador, FPI-UAM’, Universidad Aut´ onoma de Madrid, Spain. Lea Francia’s work is supported by funds from the European Union’s recovery, transformation, resilience, and Next Generation-EU plan: Exp. INVESTIGO 2022-C23. I01.P03.S0020-0000031- ´ Area Psiquiatría). J. L. Ayuso-Mateos acknowledges the support from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (BA21- 00013).
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
depressive episode, ICD, diagnostic criteria, general population
Citación
Lea Francia, Marta Miret, Elvira Lara, Blanca Dolz Del Castellar, Joan Domenech-Abella, Beatriz Olaya, Josep Maria Haro, Daniel Morillo Cuadrado, José Luis Ayuso Mateos,Impact of the changes from ICD-10 to ICD-11 in the diagnosis of depressive disorder in the general population,Journal of Psychiatric Research,Volume 184,2025,pages 367-370,ISSN 0022-3956,https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.03.012.
Centro
Facultad de Psicología
Departamento
Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento