Cargando...
Fecha
2018-04-28
Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editorial
Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED)
Citas
Resumen
El trabajo estudia la evolución y situación actual del recurso de amparo ante el Tribunal Constitucional. Parte de la base de que la cuestión consiste en analizar la aplicación y resultados de la reforma de la Ley Orgánica del Tribunal Constitucional que se realizó en 2007. La reforma se aplicó con algún titubeo inicialmente por parte del Tribunal Constitucional pero finalmente se ha llevado hasta las últimas consecuencias. Esto ha producido un resultado positivo, pues el Tribunal Constitucional está prácticamente al día, muy lejos de la situación de inviabilidad que se dibujaba cuando se concibió la reforma, es decir, en torno al año 2006. Pero la reforma sigue siendo criticada por haber disminuido las garantías del justiciable. Sin embargo, los datos que ofrece en sus Memorias el Tribunal Constitucional permiten constatar que la inmensa mayoría de los recursos se inadmiten por defectuoso planteamiento.
El trabajo propone como mejoras el establecimiento de salas de amparo en los Tribunales Superiores de Justicia y en el Tribunal Supremo y el rigor en la exigencia de la invocación del derecho fundamental tan pronto como es vulnerado. Además, considera aconsejable que los abogados no se limiten a la invocación genérica del derecho fundamental, sino que expongan ante la jurisdicción ordinaria el embrión del posible recurso de amparo.
The article studies the evolution and the current situation of the amparo appeal before the Constitutional Court. The question is to analyze the application and results of the reform of the Constitutional Court Organization Act that was held in 2007. The reform was applied with some hesitation initially by the Constitutional Court but finally has been carried to the last consequences. This has produced a positive result, because the Constitutional Court is practically up to date, very far from the situation of unfeasibility that was drawn when the reform was conceived, that is to say, around the year 2006. But the reform continues being criticized for having diminished the guarantees of the defendant. However, the data that the Constitutional Court offers in its reports allow us to confirm that the vast majority of the appeals are inadmissible due to a defective approach. The work proposes as improvements the establishment of amparo chambers in the Superior Courts of Justice and in the Supreme Court and the rigor in demanding the invocation of the fundamental right as soon as it is violated. In addition, it considers advisable that the lawyers expose before the ordinary jurisdiction the embryo of the possible resource of amparo.
The article studies the evolution and the current situation of the amparo appeal before the Constitutional Court. The question is to analyze the application and results of the reform of the Constitutional Court Organization Act that was held in 2007. The reform was applied with some hesitation initially by the Constitutional Court but finally has been carried to the last consequences. This has produced a positive result, because the Constitutional Court is practically up to date, very far from the situation of unfeasibility that was drawn when the reform was conceived, that is to say, around the year 2006. But the reform continues being criticized for having diminished the guarantees of the defendant. However, the data that the Constitutional Court offers in its reports allow us to confirm that the vast majority of the appeals are inadmissible due to a defective approach. The work proposes as improvements the establishment of amparo chambers in the Superior Courts of Justice and in the Supreme Court and the rigor in demanding the invocation of the fundamental right as soon as it is violated. In addition, it considers advisable that the lawyers expose before the ordinary jurisdiction the embryo of the possible resource of amparo.
Descripción
La versión registrada de este artículo, publicado por primera vez en Revista de Derecho Político, está disponible en línea en el sitio web del editor: Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.101.2018.21976
The registered version of this article, first published in Revista de Derecho Político, is available online at the publisher's website: EDITOR, https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.101.2018.21976
The registered version of this article, first published in Revista de Derecho Político, is available online at the publisher's website: EDITOR, https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.101.2018.21976
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
Recurso de amparo, Especial trascendencia constitucional, Incidente de nulidad de actuaciones, Garantías constitucionales, Ley Orgánica del Tribunal Constitucional, Amparo Appeal, Motion for dismissal of proceedings, Special constitutional significance
Citación
Tenorio Sánchez, P. J. (2018). ¿Qué fue del recurso de amparo ante el Tribunal Constitucional?. Revista de Derecho Político, 1(101), 703–740. https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.101.2018.21976
Centro
Facultad de Derecho
Departamento
Derecho Constitucional