Cargando...
Fecha
2021-09-09
Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editorial
University of Windsor
Citas
Resumen
This paper endorses a view of argumentation and arguments that relates both to a special type of speech action, namely, the performance of speech acts of arguing. Its aim is to advance an analysis of those acts that takes into account two kinds of norms related to their correct performance, namely, felicity conditions and objective requirements related to the “correspondence with the facts.” It assumes that the requirement that certain objective conditions be satisfied is among the set of felicity conditions of speech acts of arguing. Taking this into account helps clarify the position and role of warrants in the performance and assessment of these acts.
Descripción
The registered version of this article, first published in “Informal Logic 41, 2021", is available online at the publisher's website: University of Windsor, https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v41i3.6854
La versión registrada de este artículo, publicado por primera vez en “Informal Logic 41, 2021", está disponible en línea en el sitio web del editor: University of Windsor, https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v41i3.6854
La versión registrada de este artículo, publicado por primera vez en “Informal Logic 41, 2021", está disponible en línea en el sitio web del editor: University of Windsor, https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v41i3.6854
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
acts of arguing, illocutionary, objective assessment, warrant, Aus-tin, Toulmin
Citación
Corredor, Cristina. 2021. “Illocutionary performance and objective assessment in the speech act of arguing”. Informal Logic 41(3): 453-483. DOI: 10.22329/il.v41i3.6854
Centro
Facultad de Filosofía
Departamento
Lógica, Historia y Filosofía de la Ciencia