Cargando...
Fecha
2013-10-01
Derechos de acceso
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editorial
Iustel
Citas
Resumen
El trabajo pretende dar cuenta de los mecanismos de reconocimiento y garantía de los derechos en el ámbito de las instituciones europeas empleando para ello dos hilos conductores: la evolución de las instituciones de la Unión Europea hacia un reconocimiento cada vez más extenso e intenso de los derechos fundamentales, por una parte, y por otra, el diálogo entre altos tribunales y muy particularmente entre Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea y Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos. El TJ, que empezó siendo receptor de la doctrina del TEDH, pasó a ser también parte activa del diálogo con el TEDH, afirmando el carácter autónomo de los derechos reconocidos en la Unión Europea dada la especificidad de los Tratados. Y este carácter autónomo queda plenamente consolidado con la aprobación de la CDFUE. Entre las conclusiones, cabe destacar que en la STJ del asunto Melloni el TJ ha dejado claro que no es posible un doble estándar de protección cuando ya existen garantías comunes en el ámbito de la Unión. Esto, cuando menos, parece conducir a que se reduzca el ámbito de aplicación de la concepción del constitucionalismo multinivel. En tanto el sistema europeo de definición de los derechos no tenga contornos más nítidos, será necesario el diálogo entre estos tribunales, concretamente, entre el TJ y los Tribunales Constitucionales, de una parte, y, de otra, entre TJ y TEDH y viceversa.
This paper aims to give an overview of the various mechanisms for the recognition and protection of fundamental rights within the European Institutions. For that purpose, it will analyse, on the one side, the evolution of the European Union institutions towards a broader and further fundamental right protection. On the other side, it will cover the judicial dialogue between higher courts and, in particular, between the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The ECJ, which initially followed the case law of the ECtHR, would later become an active participant in the judicial dialogue with the ECtHR, thus affirming the autonomous character of fundamental rights derived from the EU legal order due to the specificity of the Treaties. This autonomous character is fully consolidated with the adoption of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Among this paper’s conclusions, the ECJ ruling in Melloni can be underlined as a clarification of the impossibility of maintaining a double standard of protection when there are common warrants in place at Union level. This case law seems to inevitably lead to the reduction of the scope of application of the concept of multilevel constitutionalism. As long as the European system for the recognition of rights lacks a further definition of its limits, judicial dialogue between higher courts -between the ECJ and national constitutional courts on the one side, and on the other side, between the ECJ and the ECtHR and viceversa - will remain necessary.
This paper aims to give an overview of the various mechanisms for the recognition and protection of fundamental rights within the European Institutions. For that purpose, it will analyse, on the one side, the evolution of the European Union institutions towards a broader and further fundamental right protection. On the other side, it will cover the judicial dialogue between higher courts and, in particular, between the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). The ECJ, which initially followed the case law of the ECtHR, would later become an active participant in the judicial dialogue with the ECtHR, thus affirming the autonomous character of fundamental rights derived from the EU legal order due to the specificity of the Treaties. This autonomous character is fully consolidated with the adoption of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Among this paper’s conclusions, the ECJ ruling in Melloni can be underlined as a clarification of the impossibility of maintaining a double standard of protection when there are common warrants in place at Union level. This case law seems to inevitably lead to the reduction of the scope of application of the concept of multilevel constitutionalism. As long as the European system for the recognition of rights lacks a further definition of its limits, judicial dialogue between higher courts -between the ECJ and national constitutional courts on the one side, and on the other side, between the ECJ and the ECtHR and viceversa - will remain necessary.
Descripción
La versión registrada de este artículo, publicado por primera vez en Revista General de Derecho Europeo, está disponible en línea en el sitio web del editor: Iustel, https://www.iustel.com/v2/revistas/detalle_revista.asp?id_noticia=413847
The registered version of this article, first published in Revista General de Derecho Europeo, is available online at the publisher's website: Iustel, https://www.iustel.com/v2/revistas/detalle_revista.asp?id_noticia=413847
The registered version of this article, first published in Revista General de Derecho Europeo, is available online at the publisher's website: Iustel, https://www.iustel.com/v2/revistas/detalle_revista.asp?id_noticia=413847
Categorías UNESCO
Palabras clave
Akkerberg Fransson, Bosphorus, Carta de Derechos fundamentales de la Unión Europea, Comunidad de Derecho, Constitucionalismo multinivel, Convenio Europeo de derechos humanos, Diálogo entre tribunales, Derechos fundamentales, Melloni, Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea, Akkerberg Fransson, Bosphorus, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Community of Rights, Multilevel Constitutionalism, European Convention of Human Rights, fundamental rights, judicial dialogue, Melloni, European Court of Human Rights, European Court of Justice
Citación
Tenorio Sánchez, P. J. (2013). Diálogo entre tribunales y protección de los derechos fundamentales en el ámbito europeo. Revista General de Derecho Europeo, 31.
Centro
Facultad de Derecho
Departamento
Derecho Constitucional